Saturday, July 25, 2020

Angel of Death

「…君…もしかしてアケルダマの…」
『栄光館殺人事件』

"Are you... perhaps from Akeldama...?"
"The Murder Case in the Glory Manor"

I haven't spent much time in Nagasaki, but it was funny I could instantly recognize the town in today's volume, even though it's only decribed as "N." The trams especially gave it away.

On the outskirts of the city of N(agasaki) lies the Glory Manor: it was only a few centuries ago that kakure kirishitan (underground Roman Catholics) lived in secret on these grounds and later, a person in the Tokoyoda clan bought the manor as well as the countless of religious art pieces and relics of the members of the church. The spacious garden is riddled with stone statues of religious figures, and the interior of the house is also full of crosses, Maria-Kannon figures and other valuable pieces of religious art. As their parents are no more, the sisters Manami and Ritsuko live here together with their grandfather and clan patriarch Kousuke, as well as their uncle Kensuke and his family. Manami is trying to get out of the dreary house as soon as possible: life at the Glory Manor is neigh insufferable, not just because of her good-for-nothing uncle, but especially because of her controlling grandfather, who is about to ruin older sister Ritsuko's life for good. Ritsuko is only twenty, but Kousuke has arranged for Ritsuko to be married into a powerful family right away, robbing her of any chance to live a life of her own, and that same fate awaits Manami in a few years. A special gathering is scheduled for the twenty-eigth of December, where Ritsuko and her fiancé are to exchange their engagement rings to seal the deal. Among the invitees are the family friend and doctor, as well as the young Roman-Catholic priest Sakura Souichirou, who is here to convey blessings to the engaged couple, as his religious mentor has close ties with the Tokoyoda clan. Despite the joyous occasion, grandfather Kousuke seems to have trouble getting out of bed that morning, but the maid can do much about it: while she has a spare key, her master's bedroom is also bolted from inside. After noon however, everybody becomes worried and they break the door down, only to find Kousuke lying dead on his bed, his head bashed in with an art piece of Jesus on the Cross. But curiously, they also find the windows facing the garden bolted from the inside (even covered in spider webs), meaning the man was killed inside a locked room! The police finds the house has more than enough suspects: from Manami and Ritsuko whose lives were being controlled by their grandfather to uncle Kensuke, who was about to be thrown out the house together with his family. Even Father Sakura is suspected, but he is the only one who can see through all the mist and bring forth the truth in Eikoukan Satsujin Jiken ("The Murder Case in the Glory Manor" 1997).

2018's Honkaku Mystery Comics Seminar was a highly informative work on the history of mystery manga and it has helped me identify a lot of interesting titles. My attention was especially drawn to the period of 70-80s, with the works of female artists like Hagio Moto, Yamada Mineko, Maya Mineo and Takashina Ryouko writing the earliest original puzzle plot mystery manga which would pave the way for Kindaichi Shounen no Jikenbo, Detective Conan and Q.E.D. in the early to mid nineties. But there are of course also plenty of mystery manga created after the great turning point, and one of the titles mentioned in Honkaku Mystery Comics Seminar stood out in my eyes. The Case Notes of Father Sakura was a short series created by Aoki Gorou (writer) and Ogawa Koushin (artist). The limited series that first introduced the reader to the silent priest Sakura was serialized between 1996-1997 in the comic magazine Afternoon with the title Eikoukan Satsujin Jiken as a single story, but Father Sakura would return again later in 1997 for a serialized sequel, which completed the two-volume series.


What caught my attention however was not the promises of locked room murders or anything like that. What made the description in Honkaku Mystery Comics Seminar stand was the mention that this comic featured a formal Challenge to the Reader. Series like Kindaichi Shounen no Jikenbo, Detective Conan and Q.E.D. do have faux Challenges as the protagonists have key catchphrases that indicate when they have solved the crime (meaning the reader can do so too at that point) or they make use of the division in chapters to convey when all the clues are there, but I am a big fan of the formal Challenge to the Reader, where the author speaks directly to the reader to indicate that now all the necessary clues are available and you can logically deduce who the killer is. Having a Challenge to the Reader creates expectations of a mystery story that is written and structured in a particular way, so I was quite excited to try this short series out. In this series, the Challenge to the Reader is framed as the writer of the manga, Aoki Gorou, addressing the reader, as he recounts a tale he has been told by Father Sakura himself.

In general, Eikoukan Satsujin Jiken is a good mystery story, that however perhaps could've been tweaked to make for a better challenge. Story-wise, the volume follows a familiar formula: a hated family patriarch who is killed in a creepy house, everyone in the family has a reason to want to kill the man, etc. The volume is about 250 pages long, so similar to a regular serial in the Kindaichi Shounen no Jikenbo series, but that's actually quite lengthy for a mystery manga, as single stories are seldom this long. It works great for Eikoukan Satsujin Jiken though, as it takes its time to set the scene and work in all kinds of clues over the whole length of the story, without the tale ever feeling too dragged out. Some of the visual clewing is really clever too: some hints are shown very early in the story, before anything has even happened, but it's definitely fair to show it to the reader at this point already (it's shown a few more times later on too) and it shows that Eikoukan Satsujin Jiken is a tightly plotted story from start to finish.


It's therefore such a shame the second murder in the story gives so much away! Just before the reader is presented with the Challenge to the Reader, a second killing occurs, where someone is stabbed in the back and thrown off a balcony, but the presentation here is so obvious any reader can instantly guess who the murderer is! Some of the clues are well hidden in the visuals, but you don't even really need to identify those clues because the whole thing is telegraphed so obviously to the reader, and once you guess who the murderer is in this second killing, it isn't hard to work out the way this character fits in with the first murder. Which is a shame, because I really like how the reasoning process surrounding the  first locked room murder ultimately leads to the identity of the killer, and this alone (so without the second killing) would've been pretty good too. The solution to how the locked room was achieved is not super complex, but I like how it's set-up so the attentive reader can figure it out without expecting the reader to be some kind of genius who miraculously thinks fo the solution by combining obscure hint A and obscure hint B. But what makes Eikoukan Satsujin Jiken an interesting story is how it builds on that solution and some other facts uncovered during the investigation and how a logical trail is laid out for the reader to follow. Even if you manage to solve the locked room conundrum, you'll still find a few crafty contradictions blocking your path. We see the bread and butter of the Queen school of detective fiction here, as you have to consider the logical implications of those contradictions, the actions or inactions of the killer that could've caused those contradictions and the underlying reasons for that, and only by considering all of that, you can make a logical argument against the killer. So it's such a shame the second killing makes the identity of the murderer so painfully obvious, as the way the story was built around the first killing is quite good and perfect for a mystery story with a Challenge to the Reader.


The way Roman-Catholic motifs are incorporated in the story is kinda weeeeeird by the way. Father Sakura's first appearance involves him talking randomly about Akeldama and the Glory Manor is supposed to hold all kinds of art objects involved with Roman-Catholics but we also have a stone statue of Abaddon in the garden for some reason. Abadddon! It's almost like they want to take the occult angle, but the themes are not going nearly far enough to really be about occultism, so it just comes across as really weird Catholicism in this story.

But for what it's worth, I think Eikoukan Satsujin Jiken was an entertaining, and at times very well plotted mystery story which did suffer from a less thought-out second half. While the characters themselves and the storytelling can be a bit on the dry side, I think the volume is a good example of a carefully plotted mystery story that also makes use of its inherent visual properties. I think that people who like the Kindaichi Shounen series because it features longer stories, will also appreciate this series as it also has a similar tone. I have the second volume with Father Sakura waiting for me too, so I'll be sure to check that one out soon too.

Original Japanese title(s): 青木吾郎 (原), 小川 幸辰(画)『桜神父の事件ノート (1) 栄光館殺人事件』

3 comments :

  1. Oh, I've read this manga, as well as the second entry - I discovered it as I was hunting around for mystery manga translated into Chinese. I definitely concur with your opinion - I thought the Queen-esque 'logical trail' for the locked room murder was clever. I couldn't remember the second murder till you mentioned it - and then I recalled that I pinpointed the culprit because of the set up. But what was impressive was how the reasoning as to why it was that person with respect to the first crime still packed a punch.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If I recall correctly - the second murder was unhelpful in a somewhat similar fashion as to how the very first Kindaichi manga, the 1st Opera House Murders, made the culprit quite obvious?

      Delete
    2. The presentation of the second murder was honestly really bad. The moment the scene starts (even before the victim falls from the balcony), it becomes clear who the murderer is because the whole thing is presented so awkwardly. The actual proof Father Sakura has for this murder is pretty good though: I had go back in the book to check in what scenes you could see the visual clues that proved that the second victim couldn't have [spoiler], but you actually already see that one of the earliest scenes of the whole story. So it's a shame the murder itself was telegraphed so obviously to the reader.

      The review for the second volume has already been written and will be posted next weekend ;)

      Delete